On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Ian Lance Taylor <i...@google.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Chris Lattner <clatt...@apple.com> wrote: >> >> On Sep 11, 2012, at 4:24 PM, Ian Lance Taylor <i...@google.com> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Chris Lattner <clatt...@apple.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> FYI, "backtrace" is a well-known function provide by glibc (and other >>>> libc's). It might be best to pick another name. >>> >>> Good point. Thanks. I renamed it to backtrace_full. I've included >>> the updated backtrace.h here. The other changes are mechanical. >> >> What do you think of (poor man's) namespacification? You could prefix >> symbols with "libbacktrace_", which I think is much less likely to conflict, >> and be much more clear to clients. > > Right now they all begin with "backtrace_".
That is a good choice for a C interface. I don't think it needs to be longer. -- Gaby
