On Sep 11, 2012, at 4:24 PM, Ian Lance Taylor <i...@google.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Chris Lattner <clatt...@apple.com> wrote: >> >> FYI, "backtrace" is a well-known function provide by glibc (and other >> libc's). It might be best to pick another name. > > Good point. Thanks. I renamed it to backtrace_full. I've included > the updated backtrace.h here. The other changes are mechanical. What do you think of (poor man's) namespacification? You could prefix symbols with "libbacktrace_", which I think is much less likely to conflict, and be much more clear to clients. -Chris
