On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Chris Lattner <clatt...@apple.com> wrote: > > On Sep 11, 2012, at 4:24 PM, Ian Lance Taylor <i...@google.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Chris Lattner <clatt...@apple.com> wrote: >>> >>> FYI, "backtrace" is a well-known function provide by glibc (and other >>> libc's). It might be best to pick another name. >> >> Good point. Thanks. I renamed it to backtrace_full. I've included >> the updated backtrace.h here. The other changes are mechanical. > > What do you think of (poor man's) namespacification? You could prefix > symbols with "libbacktrace_", which I think is much less likely to conflict, > and be much more clear to clients.
Right now they all begin with "backtrace_". Any other opinions on whether "libbacktrace_" is better than "backtrace_"? Ian
