On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:34:40 -0400
Ulrich Drepper <drep...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Paolo Carlini
> <paolo.carl...@oracle.com> wro
> > The substance isn't of course. But normally we don't have __gnu_cxx
> > things in the same std header. Can't we have a new ext/random and
> > put it in there? If we can separate the new code to it, I think
> > people would not even object to the target dependency, etc. In ext/
> > we are quite free to do extension / experimental work.
>
> OK, I moved the definition to ext. Will check in the result.
Nice! Thanks.
Here's a small patchlet to set the abi version to .18. With this,
check-abi will pass.
tested x86/linux
-benjamin
2012-08-30 Benjamin Kosnik <b...@redhat.com>
* testsuite/util/testsuite_abi.cc (check_version): Add GLIBCXX_3.4.18.
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util/testsuite_abi.cc b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util/testsuite_abi.cc
index 4721ccd..a5066cc 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util/testsuite_abi.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util/testsuite_abi.cc
@@ -195,6 +195,7 @@ check_version(symbol& test, bool added)
known_versions.push_back("GLIBCXX_3.4.15");
known_versions.push_back("GLIBCXX_3.4.16");
known_versions.push_back("GLIBCXX_3.4.17");
+ known_versions.push_back("GLIBCXX_3.4.18");
known_versions.push_back("GLIBCXX_LDBL_3.4");
known_versions.push_back("GLIBCXX_LDBL_3.4.7");
known_versions.push_back("GLIBCXX_LDBL_3.4.10");
@@ -222,7 +223,7 @@ check_version(symbol& test, bool added)
test.version_status = symbol::incompatible;
// Check that added symbols are added in the latest pre-release version.
- bool latestp = (test.version_name == "GLIBCXX_3.4.17"
+ bool latestp = (test.version_name == "GLIBCXX_3.4.18"
|| test.version_name == "CXXABI_1.3.6"
|| test.version_name == "CXXABI_TM_1");
if (added && !latestp)
