On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Paolo Carlini <paolo.carl...@oracle.com> wro > The substance isn't of course. But normally we don't have __gnu_cxx things > in the same std header. Can't we have a new ext/random and put it in there? > If we can separate the new code to it, I think people would not even object > to the target dependency, etc. In ext/ we are quite free to do extension / > experimental work.
OK, I moved the definition to ext. Will check in the result.
