On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 05:49:53PM +0000, Qing Zhao wrote:
> One more note here, previously, ACCESS_MODE has 5 values:
> -1: Unknown access semantics
> 0: none
> 1: read_only
> 2: write_only
> 3: read_write
>
> For counted_by, I passed “-1” to the .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE.
>
> With the new design, ACCESS_MODE has only 4 values (I think that the -1 is
> not necessary, 0 should be enough)
>
> 0: none
> 1: read_only
> 2: write_only
> 3: read_write
>
> For counted_by, I passed “0” to the .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE.
>
> Later, when we reimplement the “access” attribute by using .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE,
> the ACCESS_MODE will be used
> At that time.
>
> What do you think?
Another value (like 4) can always be added to the set if needed, it can be a
bitmask, etc.
Jakub
