> On Jul 10, 2025, at 13:53, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 05:49:53PM +0000, Qing Zhao wrote: >> One more note here, previously, ACCESS_MODE has 5 values: >> -1: Unknown access semantics >> 0: none >> 1: read_only >> 2: write_only >> 3: read_write >> >> For counted_by, I passed “-1” to the .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE. >> >> With the new design, ACCESS_MODE has only 4 values (I think that the -1 is >> not necessary, 0 should be enough) >> >> 0: none >> 1: read_only >> 2: write_only >> 3: read_write >> >> For counted_by, I passed “0” to the .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE. >> >> Later, when we reimplement the “access” attribute by using >> .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE, the ACCESS_MODE will be used >> At that time. >> >> What do you think? > > Another value (like 4) can always be added to the set if needed, it can be a > bitmask, etc.
Yeah, might need more values later when we use this function to implement other attributes. thanks. Qing > > Jakub >
