> It looks like there's ~200 uses of risc_v in dg-do run clauses in the > "sat" subdirectory tests. Should those be adjusted as well?
Yes, I will take care of that soon. Pan -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Law <jeffreya...@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 8, 2025 9:47 PM To: Li, Pan2 <pan2...@intel.com>; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai; kito.ch...@gmail.com; rdapp....@gmail.com; Chen, Ken <ken.c...@intel.com>; Liu, Hongtao <hongtao....@intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: Disable uint128_t testcase of SAT_MUL when rv32 On 7/7/25 9:48 PM, Li, Pan2 wrote: >> Is that correct? Don't you need to be testing that the platform has >> vector in addition to being rv64? > > It is riscv.exp test, so I think vector extension is not required here. Oh, I see. We're not actually turning on RVV anywhere. OK for the trunk. It looks like there's ~200 uses of risc_v in dg-do run clauses in the "sat" subdirectory tests. Should those be adjusted as well? jeff
