On 5/22/25 9:26 PM, Yangyu Chen wrote:
On 23 May 2025, at 04:02, Jeff Law <jeffreya...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/22/25 9:05 AM, Alfie Richards wrote:
Hi Jeff,
I sent this patch with my implementation a while ago:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-April/681043.html
There hasn't been any feedback on that patch yet.
These patches are still useful and I would like to go ahead with them. I am in
favour of using my implementation as it is a bit stronger, but it also requires
my larger FMV series to be approved first.
Can you ping your larger FMV series? I strongly suspect everyone is digging
out from everything that queued up while the trunk was in bugfixing stages.
Yangyu -- what are your thought here? If we went with Alfie's patch, does it
solve the problems you're interested in, and what patches of yours would still
be relevant if we incorporated Alfie's work?
I agree with Alfie's approach. We are addressing the same issue.
His patch is more structured and includes test cases.
His patch lacks a target hook for RISC-V, while mine does. However,
I think it's OK if we get his patch accepted, and I will write that
for RISC-V.
So if it's OK with you I'd like to temporarily shift focus over to
Alfie's patch to get that moved forward, then come back to the RISC-V
specific stuff?
Jeff
