> On 23 May 2025, at 04:02, Jeff Law <jeffreya...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 5/22/25 9:05 AM, Alfie Richards wrote:
>> Hi Jeff,
>> I sent this patch with my implementation a while ago:
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-April/681043.html
>> There hasn't been any feedback on that patch yet.
>> These patches are still useful and I would like to go ahead with them. I am
>> in favour of using my implementation as it is a bit stronger, but it also
>> requires my larger FMV series to be approved first.
> Can you ping your larger FMV series? I strongly suspect everyone is digging
> out from everything that queued up while the trunk was in bugfixing stages.
>
> Yangyu -- what are your thought here? If we went with Alfie's patch, does it
> solve the problems you're interested in, and what patches of yours would
> still be relevant if we incorporated Alfie's work?
>
I agree with Alfie's approach. We are addressing the same issue.
His patch is more structured and includes test cases.
His patch lacks a target hook for RISC-V, while mine does. However,
I think it's OK if we get his patch accepted, and I will write that
for RISC-V.
Thanks,
Yangyu Chen
