Re: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: Introduce gcc option mrvv-vector-bits for RVV

[Jeff Law]

On 2/23/24 01:22, Kito Cheng wrote:
I would prefer to only keep zvl and scalable or zvl only, since I
don't see too much value in specifying a value which different from
zvl*b, that's a legacy option used before zvl*b option was introduced,
and the reason to add that is that could used for compatible with
clang/LLVM for riscv_rvv_vector_bits attribute I think?
And if we want this (I'm not sure), it really feels like it ought to 
defer to gcc-15.

jeff