On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Diego Novillo <dnovi...@google.com> wrote: > On 12-05-24 17:52 , Lawrence Crowl wrote: > >> That said, I'll let y'all decide how much to put in any one piece. > > > I favour the approach we are taking now. Each patch to cxx-conversion is a > small incremental step. > > When we merge into trunk we'll merge the final product of each change, of > course. But with the minimalistic approach, we can discuss and understand > each change better.
I agree. Lawrence satisfactorily answered my main concern with the patch he posted (the template argument); so I am board modulo the change on class name. -- Gaby
