OK。will add it.
---- Replied Message ----
FromKito Cheng<kito.ch...@sifive.com>
Date11/06/2023 20:46
Tojuzhe.zh...@rivai.ai<juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai>
Cckito.cheng<kito.ch...@gmail.com>,
gcc-patches<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
jeffreyalaw<jeffreya...@gmail.com>,
Robin Dapp<rdapp....@gmail.com>
SubjectRe: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Early expand DImode vec_duplicate in RV32 system
I would prefer to add a dedicated test case to test that, so that we
could also cover that even if we didn't enable multi-lib testing for
RV32, and I suppose that should only require compile test for part of
that test case ?

On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 8:41 PM juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
<juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai> wrote:
>
> Testcase already existed on the trunk, which is added by Li Pan added recently when supporting rounding mode autovec.
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-November/635280.html
>
> math-llrintf-run-0.c passed on RV64 but cause ICE on RV32.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
>
>
> From: Kito Cheng
> Date: 2023-11-06 20:38
> To: Juzhe-Zhong
> CC: gcc-patches; kito.cheng; jeffreyalaw; rdapp.gcc
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Early expand DImode vec_duplicate in RV32 system
> Could you add a testcase? other than that LGTM.
>
> On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 8:27 PM Juzhe-Zhong <juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai> wrote:
> >
> > An ICE was discovered in recent rounding autovec support:
> >
> > config/riscv/riscv-v.cc:4314
> >    65 | }
> >       | ^
> > 0x1fa5223 riscv_vector::validate_change_or_fail(rtx_def*, rtx_def**,
> > rtx_def*, bool)
> >         /home/pli/repos/gcc/222/riscv-gnu-toolchain/gcc/__RISC-V_BUILD/../gcc/config/riscv/riscv-v.cc:4314
> > 0x1fb1aa2 pre_vsetvl::remove_avl_operand()
> >         /home/pli/repos/gcc/222/riscv-gnu-toolchain/gcc/__RISC-V_BUILD/../gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc:3342
> > 0x1fb18c1 pre_vsetvl::cleaup()
> >         /home/pli/repos/gcc/222/riscv-gnu-toolchain/gcc/__RISC-V_BUILD/../gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc:3308
> > 0x1fb216d pass_vsetvl::lazy_vsetvl()
> >         /home/pli/repos/gcc/222/riscv-gnu-toolchain/gcc/__RISC-V_BUILD/../gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc:3480
> > 0x1fb2214 pass_vsetvl::execute(function*)
> >         /home/pli/repos/gcc/222/riscv-gnu-toolchain/gcc/__RISC-V_BUILD/../gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc:3504
> >
> > The root cause is that the RA reload into (set (reg) vec_duplicate:DI). However, it is not valid in RV32 system
> > since we don't have a single broadcast instruction DI scalar in RV32 system.
> > We should expand it early for RV32 system.
> >
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> >
> >         * config/riscv/predicates.md: Refine predicate.
> >         * config/riscv/riscv-protos.h (can_be_broadcasted_p): New function.
> >         * config/riscv/riscv-v.cc (can_be_broadcasted_p): Ditto.
> >         * config/riscv/vector.md (vec_duplicate<mode>): New pattern.
> >         (*vec_duplicate<mode>): Adapt pattern.
> >
> > ---
> >  gcc/config/riscv/predicates.md  |  9 +--------
> >  gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h |  1 +
> >  gcc/config/riscv/riscv-v.cc     | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >  gcc/config/riscv/vector.md      | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
> >  4 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/predicates.md b/gcc/config/riscv/predicates.md
> > index db18054607f..df1c66f3a76 100644
> > --- a/gcc/config/riscv/predicates.md
> > +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/predicates.md
> > @@ -553,14 +553,7 @@
> >
> >  ;; The scalar operand can be directly broadcast by RVV instructions.
> >  (define_predicate "direct_broadcast_operand"
> > -  (and (match_test "!(reload_completed && !FLOAT_MODE_P (GET_MODE (op))
> > -               && (register_operand (op, GET_MODE (op)) || CONST_INT_P (op)
> > -               || rtx_equal_p (op, CONST0_RTX (GET_MODE (op))))
> > -               && maybe_gt (GET_MODE_BITSIZE (GET_MODE (op)), GET_MODE_BITSIZE (Pmode)))")
> > -    (ior (match_test "rtx_equal_p (op, CONST0_RTX (GET_MODE (op)))")
> > -         (ior (match_code "const_int,const_poly_int")
> > -              (ior (match_operand 0 "register_operand")
> > -                   (match_test "satisfies_constraint_Wdm (op)"))))))
> > +  (match_test "riscv_vector::can_be_broadcasted_p (op)"))
> >
> >  ;; A CONST_INT operand that has exactly two bits cleared.
> >  (define_predicate "const_nottwobits_operand"
> > diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h
> > index 6cbf2130f88..acae00f653f 100644
> > --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h
> > +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h
> > @@ -595,6 +595,7 @@ uint8_t get_sew (rtx_insn *);
> >  enum vlmul_type get_vlmul (rtx_insn *);
> >  int count_regno_occurrences (rtx_insn *, unsigned int);
> >  bool imm_avl_p (machine_mode);
> > +bool can_be_broadcasted_p (rtx);
> >  }
> >
> >  /* We classify builtin types into two classes:
> > diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-v.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-v.cc
> > index 80d2bb9e289..a64946213c3 100644
> > --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-v.cc
> > +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-v.cc
> > @@ -4417,4 +4417,24 @@ count_regno_occurrences (rtx_insn *rinsn, unsigned int regno)
> >    return count;
> >  }
> >
> > +/* Return true if the OP can be directly broadcasted.  */
> > +bool
> > +can_be_broadcasted_p (rtx op)
> > +{
> > +  machine_mode mode = GET_MODE (op);
> > +  /* We don't allow RA (register allocation) reload generate
> > +    (vec_duplicate:DI reg) in RV32 system wheras we allow
> > +    (vec_duplicate:DI mem) in RV32 system.  */
> > +  if (!can_create_pseudo_p () && !FLOAT_MODE_P (mode)
> > +      && maybe_gt (GET_MODE_SIZE (mode), GET_MODE_SIZE (Pmode))
> > +      && !satisfies_constraint_Wdm (op))
> > +    return false;
> > +
> > +  if (satisfies_constraint_K (op) || register_operand (op, mode)
> > +      || satisfies_constraint_Wdm (op) || rtx_equal_p (op, CONST0_RTX (mode)))
> > +    return true;
> > +
> > +  return can_create_pseudo_p () && nonmemory_operand (op, mode);
> > +}
> > +
> >  } // namespace riscv_vector
> > diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/vector.md b/gcc/config/riscv/vector.md
> > index 8509c4fe5f2..e23f64938b7 100644
> > --- a/gcc/config/riscv/vector.md
> > +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/vector.md
> > @@ -1370,11 +1370,29 @@
> >  ;; ---- Duplicate Operations
> >  ;; -----------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > +(define_expand "vec_duplicate<mode>"
> > +  [(set (match_operand:V_VLS 0 "register_operand")
> > +        (vec_duplicate:V_VLS
> > +          (match_operand:<VEL> 1 "direct_broadcast_operand")))]
> > +  "TARGET_VECTOR"
> > +  {
> > +    /* Early expand DImode broadcast in RV32 system to avoid RA reload
> > +       generate (set (reg) (vec_duplicate:DI)).  */
> > +    if (maybe_gt (GET_MODE_SIZE (<VEL>mode), GET_MODE_SIZE (Pmode)))
> > +      {
> > +        riscv_vector::emit_vlmax_insn (code_for_pred_broadcast (<MODE>mode),
> > +                                      riscv_vector::UNARY_OP, operands);
> > +       DONE;
> > +      }
> > +    /* Otherwise, allow it fall into general vec_duplicate pattern
> > +       which allow us to have vv->vx combine optimization in later pass.  */
> > +  })
> > +
> >  ;; According to GCC internal:
> >  ;; This pattern only handles duplicates of non-constant inputs.
> >  ;; Constant vectors go through the movm pattern instead.
> >  ;; So "direct_broadcast_operand" can only be mem or reg, no CONSTANT.
> > -(define_insn_and_split "vec_duplicate<mode>"
> > +(define_insn_and_split "*vec_duplicate<mode>"
> >    [(set (match_operand:V_VLS 0 "register_operand")
> >          (vec_duplicate:V_VLS
> >            (match_operand:<VEL> 1 "direct_broadcast_operand")))]
> > --
> > 2.36.3
> >
>

Reply via email to