Could you add a testcase? other than that LGTM.

On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 8:27 PM Juzhe-Zhong <juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai> wrote:
>
> An ICE was discovered in recent rounding autovec support:
>
> config/riscv/riscv-v.cc:4314
>    65 | }
>       | ^
> 0x1fa5223 riscv_vector::validate_change_or_fail(rtx_def*, rtx_def**,
> rtx_def*, bool)
>         
> /home/pli/repos/gcc/222/riscv-gnu-toolchain/gcc/__RISC-V_BUILD/../gcc/config/riscv/riscv-v.cc:4314
> 0x1fb1aa2 pre_vsetvl::remove_avl_operand()
>         
> /home/pli/repos/gcc/222/riscv-gnu-toolchain/gcc/__RISC-V_BUILD/../gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc:3342
> 0x1fb18c1 pre_vsetvl::cleaup()
>         
> /home/pli/repos/gcc/222/riscv-gnu-toolchain/gcc/__RISC-V_BUILD/../gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc:3308
> 0x1fb216d pass_vsetvl::lazy_vsetvl()
>         
> /home/pli/repos/gcc/222/riscv-gnu-toolchain/gcc/__RISC-V_BUILD/../gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc:3480
> 0x1fb2214 pass_vsetvl::execute(function*)
>         
> /home/pli/repos/gcc/222/riscv-gnu-toolchain/gcc/__RISC-V_BUILD/../gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc:3504
>
> The root cause is that the RA reload into (set (reg) vec_duplicate:DI). 
> However, it is not valid in RV32 system
> since we don't have a single broadcast instruction DI scalar in RV32 system.
> We should expand it early for RV32 system.
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
>         * config/riscv/predicates.md: Refine predicate.
>         * config/riscv/riscv-protos.h (can_be_broadcasted_p): New function.
>         * config/riscv/riscv-v.cc (can_be_broadcasted_p): Ditto.
>         * config/riscv/vector.md (vec_duplicate<mode>): New pattern.
>         (*vec_duplicate<mode>): Adapt pattern.
>
> ---
>  gcc/config/riscv/predicates.md  |  9 +--------
>  gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h |  1 +
>  gcc/config/riscv/riscv-v.cc     | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  gcc/config/riscv/vector.md      | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
>  4 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/predicates.md b/gcc/config/riscv/predicates.md
> index db18054607f..df1c66f3a76 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/riscv/predicates.md
> +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/predicates.md
> @@ -553,14 +553,7 @@
>
>  ;; The scalar operand can be directly broadcast by RVV instructions.
>  (define_predicate "direct_broadcast_operand"
> -  (and (match_test "!(reload_completed && !FLOAT_MODE_P (GET_MODE (op))
> -               && (register_operand (op, GET_MODE (op)) || CONST_INT_P (op)
> -               || rtx_equal_p (op, CONST0_RTX (GET_MODE (op))))
> -               && maybe_gt (GET_MODE_BITSIZE (GET_MODE (op)), 
> GET_MODE_BITSIZE (Pmode)))")
> -    (ior (match_test "rtx_equal_p (op, CONST0_RTX (GET_MODE (op)))")
> -         (ior (match_code "const_int,const_poly_int")
> -              (ior (match_operand 0 "register_operand")
> -                   (match_test "satisfies_constraint_Wdm (op)"))))))
> +  (match_test "riscv_vector::can_be_broadcasted_p (op)"))
>
>  ;; A CONST_INT operand that has exactly two bits cleared.
>  (define_predicate "const_nottwobits_operand"
> diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h
> index 6cbf2130f88..acae00f653f 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h
> +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h
> @@ -595,6 +595,7 @@ uint8_t get_sew (rtx_insn *);
>  enum vlmul_type get_vlmul (rtx_insn *);
>  int count_regno_occurrences (rtx_insn *, unsigned int);
>  bool imm_avl_p (machine_mode);
> +bool can_be_broadcasted_p (rtx);
>  }
>
>  /* We classify builtin types into two classes:
> diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-v.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-v.cc
> index 80d2bb9e289..a64946213c3 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-v.cc
> +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-v.cc
> @@ -4417,4 +4417,24 @@ count_regno_occurrences (rtx_insn *rinsn, unsigned int 
> regno)
>    return count;
>  }
>
> +/* Return true if the OP can be directly broadcasted.  */
> +bool
> +can_be_broadcasted_p (rtx op)
> +{
> +  machine_mode mode = GET_MODE (op);
> +  /* We don't allow RA (register allocation) reload generate
> +    (vec_duplicate:DI reg) in RV32 system wheras we allow
> +    (vec_duplicate:DI mem) in RV32 system.  */
> +  if (!can_create_pseudo_p () && !FLOAT_MODE_P (mode)
> +      && maybe_gt (GET_MODE_SIZE (mode), GET_MODE_SIZE (Pmode))
> +      && !satisfies_constraint_Wdm (op))
> +    return false;
> +
> +  if (satisfies_constraint_K (op) || register_operand (op, mode)
> +      || satisfies_constraint_Wdm (op) || rtx_equal_p (op, CONST0_RTX 
> (mode)))
> +    return true;
> +
> +  return can_create_pseudo_p () && nonmemory_operand (op, mode);
> +}
> +
>  } // namespace riscv_vector
> diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/vector.md b/gcc/config/riscv/vector.md
> index 8509c4fe5f2..e23f64938b7 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/riscv/vector.md
> +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/vector.md
> @@ -1370,11 +1370,29 @@
>  ;; ---- Duplicate Operations
>  ;; -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> +(define_expand "vec_duplicate<mode>"
> +  [(set (match_operand:V_VLS 0 "register_operand")
> +        (vec_duplicate:V_VLS
> +          (match_operand:<VEL> 1 "direct_broadcast_operand")))]
> +  "TARGET_VECTOR"
> +  {
> +    /* Early expand DImode broadcast in RV32 system to avoid RA reload
> +       generate (set (reg) (vec_duplicate:DI)).  */
> +    if (maybe_gt (GET_MODE_SIZE (<VEL>mode), GET_MODE_SIZE (Pmode)))
> +      {
> +        riscv_vector::emit_vlmax_insn (code_for_pred_broadcast (<MODE>mode),
> +                                      riscv_vector::UNARY_OP, operands);
> +       DONE;
> +      }
> +    /* Otherwise, allow it fall into general vec_duplicate pattern
> +       which allow us to have vv->vx combine optimization in later pass.  */
> +  })
> +
>  ;; According to GCC internal:
>  ;; This pattern only handles duplicates of non-constant inputs.
>  ;; Constant vectors go through the movm pattern instead.
>  ;; So "direct_broadcast_operand" can only be mem or reg, no CONSTANT.
> -(define_insn_and_split "vec_duplicate<mode>"
> +(define_insn_and_split "*vec_duplicate<mode>"
>    [(set (match_operand:V_VLS 0 "register_operand")
>          (vec_duplicate:V_VLS
>            (match_operand:<VEL> 1 "direct_broadcast_operand")))]
> --
> 2.36.3
>

Reply via email to