Please disregard this email.
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 6:26 AM Ken Matsui <kmat...@cs.washington.edu>
wrote:
> Thank you!
>
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 2:12 AM Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 at 08:08, Ken Matsui <kmat...@cs.washington.edu>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Ooh... Thank you for pointing that out!
>> >
>> > > The helper doesn't need to be defined for the case where we don't use
>> it.
>> >
>> > I thought that macroing them out leads to compiler errors since users
>> > are possibly using those helpers. But do we not have to care about
>> > that?
>>
>> No, absolutely not.
>>
>> >
>> > ---
>> > libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
>> >
>> > * include/std/type_traits (remove_pointer): Use __remove_pointer
>> built-in trait.
>> >
>> > ---
>> > diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
>> > b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
>> > index 2bd607a8b8f..cba98091aad 100644
>> > --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
>> > +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
>> > @@ -2025,17 +2025,23 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
>> >
>> > template<typename _Tp, typename>
>> > struct __remove_pointer_helper
>> > - { typedef _Tp type; };
>> > + { using type = _Tp; };
>> >
>> > template<typename _Tp, typename _Up>
>> > struct __remove_pointer_helper<_Tp, _Up*>
>> > - { typedef _Up type; };
>> > + { using type = _Up; };
>> >
>> > /// remove_pointer
>> > +#if __has_builtin(__remove_pointer)
>> > + template<typename _Tp>
>> > + struct remove_pointer
>> > + { using type = __remove_pointer(_Tp); };
>> > +#else
>> > template<typename _Tp>
>> > struct remove_pointer
>> > : public __remove_pointer_helper<_Tp, __remove_cv_t<_Tp>>
>> > { };
>> > +#endif
>> >
>> > template<typename _Tp, typename = void>
>> > struct __add_pointer_helper
>> >
>> > On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 12:57 AM Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, 20 Mar 2023, 07:32 Ken Matsui via Libstdc++, <
>> libstd...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> CCing libstd...@gcc.gnu.org.
>> > >>
>> > >> On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 7:53 PM Ken Matsui <
>> kmat...@cs.washington.edu> wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> > libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
>> > >> >
>> > >> > * include/std/type_traits (is_reference): Use __remove_pointer
>> built-in trait.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > The changelog entry says is_reference but the patch is for
>> remove_pointer.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > ---
>> > >> > diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
>> > >> > b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
>> > >> > index 2bd607a8b8f..cba98091aad 100644
>> > >> > --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
>> > >> > +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
>> > >> > @@ -2025,17 +2025,23 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
>> > >> >
>> > >> > template<typename _Tp, typename>
>> > >> > struct __remove_pointer_helper
>> > >> > - { typedef _Tp type; };
>> > >> > + { using type = _Tp; };
>> > >> >
>> > >> > template<typename _Tp, typename _Up>
>> > >> > struct __remove_pointer_helper<_Tp, _Up*>
>> > >> > - { typedef _Up type; };
>> > >> > + { using type = _Up; };
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > The helper doesn't need to be defined for the case where we don't use
>> it.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > /// remove_pointer
>> > >> > +#if __has_builtin(__remove_pointer)
>> > >> > + template<typename _Tp>
>> > >> > + struct remove_pointer
>> > >> > + { using type = __remove_pointer(_Tp); };
>> > >> > +#else
>> > >> > template<typename _Tp>
>> > >> > struct remove_pointer
>> > >> > : public __remove_pointer_helper<_Tp, __remove_cv_t<_Tp>>
>> > >> > { };
>> > >> > +#endif
>> > >> >
>> > >> > template<typename _Tp, typename = void>
>> > >> > struct __add_pointer_helper
>>
>
