On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 at 08:08, Ken Matsui <kmat...@cs.washington.edu> wrote:
>
> Ooh... Thank you for pointing that out!
>
> > The helper doesn't need to be defined for the case where we don't use it.
>
> I thought that macroing them out leads to compiler errors since users
> are possibly using those helpers. But do we not have to care about
> that?

No, absolutely not.

>
> ---
> libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
>
> * include/std/type_traits (remove_pointer): Use __remove_pointer built-in 
> trait.
>
> ---
> diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
> b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
> index 2bd607a8b8f..cba98091aad 100644
> --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
> +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
> @@ -2025,17 +2025,23 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
>
>    template<typename _Tp, typename>
>      struct __remove_pointer_helper
> -    { typedef _Tp     type; };
> +    { using type = _Tp; };
>
>    template<typename _Tp, typename _Up>
>      struct __remove_pointer_helper<_Tp, _Up*>
> -    { typedef _Up     type; };
> +    { using type = _Up; };
>
>    /// remove_pointer
> +#if __has_builtin(__remove_pointer)
> +  template<typename _Tp>
> +    struct remove_pointer
> +    { using type = __remove_pointer(_Tp); };
> +#else
>    template<typename _Tp>
>      struct remove_pointer
>      : public __remove_pointer_helper<_Tp, __remove_cv_t<_Tp>>
>      { };
> +#endif
>
>    template<typename _Tp, typename = void>
>      struct __add_pointer_helper
>
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 12:57 AM Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 20 Mar 2023, 07:32 Ken Matsui via Libstdc++, 
> > <libstd...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> CCing libstd...@gcc.gnu.org.
> >>
> >> On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 7:53 PM Ken Matsui <kmat...@cs.washington.edu> 
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
> >> >
> >> > * include/std/type_traits (is_reference): Use __remove_pointer built-in 
> >> > trait.
> >
> >
> > The changelog entry says is_reference but the patch is for remove_pointer.
> >
> >
> >> >
> >> > ---
> >> > diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
> >> > b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
> >> > index 2bd607a8b8f..cba98091aad 100644
> >> > --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
> >> > +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
> >> > @@ -2025,17 +2025,23 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
> >> >
> >> >    template<typename _Tp, typename>
> >> >      struct __remove_pointer_helper
> >> > -    { typedef _Tp     type; };
> >> > +    { using type = _Tp; };
> >> >
> >> >    template<typename _Tp, typename _Up>
> >> >      struct __remove_pointer_helper<_Tp, _Up*>
> >> > -    { typedef _Up     type; };
> >> > +    { using type = _Up; };
> >
> >
> > The helper doesn't need to be defined for the case where we don't use it.
> >
> >
> >> >
> >> >    /// remove_pointer
> >> > +#if __has_builtin(__remove_pointer)
> >> > +  template<typename _Tp>
> >> > +    struct remove_pointer
> >> > +    { using type = __remove_pointer(_Tp); };
> >> > +#else
> >> >    template<typename _Tp>
> >> >      struct remove_pointer
> >> >      : public __remove_pointer_helper<_Tp, __remove_cv_t<_Tp>>
> >> >      { };
> >> > +#endif
> >> >
> >> >    template<typename _Tp, typename = void>
> >> >      struct __add_pointer_helper

Reply via email to