Thank you!
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 2:12 AM Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 at 08:08, Ken Matsui <kmat...@cs.washington.edu>
> wrote:
> >
> > Ooh... Thank you for pointing that out!
> >
> > > The helper doesn't need to be defined for the case where we don't use
> it.
> >
> > I thought that macroing them out leads to compiler errors since users
> > are possibly using those helpers. But do we not have to care about
> > that?
>
> No, absolutely not.
>
> >
> > ---
> > libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
> >
> > * include/std/type_traits (remove_pointer): Use __remove_pointer
> built-in trait.
> >
> > ---
> > diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
> > b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
> > index 2bd607a8b8f..cba98091aad 100644
> > --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
> > +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
> > @@ -2025,17 +2025,23 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
> >
> > template<typename _Tp, typename>
> > struct __remove_pointer_helper
> > - { typedef _Tp type; };
> > + { using type = _Tp; };
> >
> > template<typename _Tp, typename _Up>
> > struct __remove_pointer_helper<_Tp, _Up*>
> > - { typedef _Up type; };
> > + { using type = _Up; };
> >
> > /// remove_pointer
> > +#if __has_builtin(__remove_pointer)
> > + template<typename _Tp>
> > + struct remove_pointer
> > + { using type = __remove_pointer(_Tp); };
> > +#else
> > template<typename _Tp>
> > struct remove_pointer
> > : public __remove_pointer_helper<_Tp, __remove_cv_t<_Tp>>
> > { };
> > +#endif
> >
> > template<typename _Tp, typename = void>
> > struct __add_pointer_helper
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 12:57 AM Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 20 Mar 2023, 07:32 Ken Matsui via Libstdc++, <
> libstd...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> CCing libstd...@gcc.gnu.org.
> > >>
> > >> On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 7:53 PM Ken Matsui <kmat...@cs.washington.edu>
> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
> > >> >
> > >> > * include/std/type_traits (is_reference): Use __remove_pointer
> built-in trait.
> > >
> > >
> > > The changelog entry says is_reference but the patch is for
> remove_pointer.
> > >
> > >
> > >> >
> > >> > ---
> > >> > diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
> > >> > b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
> > >> > index 2bd607a8b8f..cba98091aad 100644
> > >> > --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
> > >> > +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/type_traits
> > >> > @@ -2025,17 +2025,23 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
> > >> >
> > >> > template<typename _Tp, typename>
> > >> > struct __remove_pointer_helper
> > >> > - { typedef _Tp type; };
> > >> > + { using type = _Tp; };
> > >> >
> > >> > template<typename _Tp, typename _Up>
> > >> > struct __remove_pointer_helper<_Tp, _Up*>
> > >> > - { typedef _Up type; };
> > >> > + { using type = _Up; };
> > >
> > >
> > > The helper doesn't need to be defined for the case where we don't use
> it.
> > >
> > >
> > >> >
> > >> > /// remove_pointer
> > >> > +#if __has_builtin(__remove_pointer)
> > >> > + template<typename _Tp>
> > >> > + struct remove_pointer
> > >> > + { using type = __remove_pointer(_Tp); };
> > >> > +#else
> > >> > template<typename _Tp>
> > >> > struct remove_pointer
> > >> > : public __remove_pointer_helper<_Tp, __remove_cv_t<_Tp>>
> > >> > { };
> > >> > +#endif
> > >> >
> > >> > template<typename _Tp, typename = void>
> > >> > struct __add_pointer_helper
>
