Optimize vec_splats of constant vec_extract for V2DI/V2DF, PR target 99293.

In PR target/99293, it was pointed out that doing:

        vector long long dest0, dest1, src;
        /* ... */
        dest0 = vec_splats (vec_extract (src, 0));
        dest1 = vec_splats (vec_extract (src, 1));

would generate slower code.

It generates the following code on power8:

        ;; vec_splats (vec_extract (src, 0))
        xxpermdi 0,34,34,3
        xxpermdi 34,0,0,0

        ;; vec_splats (vec_extract (src, 1))
        xxlor 0,34,34
        xxpermdi 34,0,0,0

However on power9 and power10 it generates:

        ;; vec_splats (vec_extract (src, 0))
        mfvsld 3,34
        mtvsrdd 34,9,9

        ;; vec_splats (vec_extract (src, 1))
        mfvsrd 9,34
        mtvsrdd 34,9,9

This is due to the power9 having the mfvsrld instruction which can extract
either 64-bit element into a GPR.  While there are alternatives for both
vector registers and GPR registers, the register allocator prefers to put
DImode into GPR registers.

However in this case, it is better to have a single combiner pattern that
can generate a single xxpermdi, instead of doing 2 insnsns (the extract
and then the concat).  This is particularly true if the two operations are
move from vector register and move to vector register.

I have built Spec 2017 with this patch installed, and the cam4_r benchmark
is the only benchmark that generated different code.  On a power9, I did
not notice any significant changes in the runtime of cam4_r.

I have built bootstrap versions on the following systems.  There were no
regressions in the runs:

        Power9 little endian, --with-cpu=power9
        Power10 little endian, --with-cpu=power10
        Power8 big endian, --with-cpu=power8 (both 32-bit & 64-bit tests)

Can I install this into the trunk?  After a burn-in period, can I backport
and install this into GCC 11 and GCC 10 branches?

2022-03-28   Michael Meissner  <meiss...@linux.ibm.com>

gcc/
        PR target/99293
        * config/rs6000/vsx.md (vsx_splat_const_extract_<mode>): New
        combiner insn.

gcc/testsuite:
        PR target/99293
        * gcc.target/powerpc/pr99293.c: New test.
---
 gcc/config/rs6000/vsx.md                   | 19 ++++++++++++
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr99293.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr99293.c

diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/vsx.md b/gcc/config/rs6000/vsx.md
index 15bd86dfdfb..ddafbe471dd 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/vsx.md
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/vsx.md
@@ -4616,6 +4616,25 @@ (define_insn "vsx_splat_v4si_di"
   [(set_attr "type" "vecperm")
    (set_attr "isa" "p8v,*")])
 
+;; Optimize SPLAT of an extract from a V2DF/V2DI vector with a constant element
+;; PR target/99293
+(define_insn "*vsx_splat_const_extract_<mode>"
+  [(set (match_operand:VSX_D 0 "vsx_register_operand" "=wa")
+       (vec_duplicate:VSX_D
+        (vec_select:<VS_scalar>
+         (match_operand:VSX_D 1 "vsx_register_operand" "wa")
+         (parallel [(match_operand 2 "const_0_to_1_operand" "n")]))))]
+  "VECTOR_MEM_VSX_P (<MODE>mode)"
+{
+  int which_word = INTVAL (operands[2]);
+  if (!BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN)
+    which_word = 1 - which_word;
+
+  operands[3] = GEN_INT (which_word ? 3 : 0);
+  return "xxpermdi %x0,%x1,%x1,%3";
+}
+  [(set_attr "type" "vecperm")])
+
 ;; V4SF splat (ISA 3.0)
 (define_insn_and_split "vsx_splat_v4sf"
   [(set (match_operand:V4SF 0 "vsx_register_operand" "=wa,wa,wa")
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr99293.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr99293.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..13b5ed5b0b1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr99293.c
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+/* { dg-do compile { target powerpc*-*-* } } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_vsx_ok } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -mvsx" } */
+
+/* Test for PR 99263, which wants to do:
+   __builtin_vec_splats (__builtin_vec_extract (v, n))
+
+   where v is a V2DF or V2DI vector and n is either 0 or 1.  Previously the
+   compiler would do a direct move to the GPR registers to select the item and
+   a direct move from the GPR registers to do the splat.  */
+
+vector long long
+splat_dup_ll_0 (vector long long v)
+{
+  return __builtin_vec_splats (__builtin_vec_extract (v, 0));
+}
+       
+vector long long
+splat_dup_ll_1 (vector long long v)
+{
+  return __builtin_vec_splats (__builtin_vec_extract (v, 1));
+}
+
+vector double
+splat_dup_d_0 (vector double v)
+{
+  return __builtin_vec_splats (__builtin_vec_extract (v, 0));
+}
+       
+vector double
+splat_dup_d_1 (vector double v)
+{
+  return __builtin_vec_splats (__builtin_vec_extract (v, 1));
+}
+       
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "xxpermdi" 4 } } */
-- 
2.35.1


-- 
Michael Meissner, IBM
PO Box 98, Ayer, Massachusetts, USA, 01432
email: meiss...@linux.ibm.com

Reply via email to