On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 10:38 AM Martin Liška <mli...@suse.cz> wrote: > > Hi. > > Recently I've introduced a new .gnu.lto_.lto section that > is supposed to provide meta information about a LTO bytecode. > > As a further step, I'm planning to teach binutils about > existence of the section and I'll remove in the future > emission of __gnu_lto_slim and __gnu_lto_v1 symbols. > The former one is used by binutils to identify if > an object is a slim LTO object. The later one is currently > used only in gcc/collect2.c and was added by David's patch. > > My question is: Can we remove __gnu_lto_v1 right now and > XCOFF will use something similar to ELF (has_lto_section)? > Can you David help me with that please?
LTO currently does not work on AIX. I added the __gnu_lto_v1 as a test. You can rip it out and XCOFF will follow a different path when implementing LTO. Thanks David
