Hi. Recently I've introduced a new .gnu.lto_.lto section that is supposed to provide meta information about a LTO bytecode.
As a further step, I'm planning to teach binutils about existence of the section and I'll remove in the future emission of __gnu_lto_slim and __gnu_lto_v1 symbols. The former one is used by binutils to identify if an object is a slim LTO object. The later one is currently used only in gcc/collect2.c and was added by David's patch. My question is: Can we remove __gnu_lto_v1 right now and XCOFF will use something similar to ELF (has_lto_section)? Can you David help me with that please? Thank you, Martin
