On 5/15/19 5:19 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > > For the official converted repo do we really want all (old) > development branches to be in the > main git repo? I suppose we could create a readonly git from the > state of the whole repository > at the point of conversion (and also keep the SVN in readonly mode), > just to make migration > of content we want easy in the future? I've always assumed we'd keep the old SVN tree read-only for historical purposes. I strongly suspect that, ignoring release branches, that non-active branches just aren't terribly interesting.
Jeff
