On 5/16/19 12:36 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 5:41 PM Maxim Kuvyrkov > <maxim.kuvyr...@linaro.org> wrote: >> >>> On May 16, 2019, at 7:22 PM, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 5/15/19 5:19 AM, Richard Biener wrote: >>>> >>>> For the official converted repo do we really want all (old) >>>> development branches to be in the >>>> main git repo? I suppose we could create a readonly git from the >>>> state of the whole repository >>>> at the point of conversion (and also keep the SVN in readonly mode), >>>> just to make migration >>>> of content we want easy in the future? >>> I've always assumed we'd keep the old SVN tree read-only for historical >>> purposes. I strongly suspect that, ignoring release branches, that >>> non-active branches just aren't terribly interesting. >> >> Let's avoid mixing the two discussions: (1) converting svn repo to git (and >> getting community consensus to switch to git) and (2) deciding on which >> branches to keep in the new repo. >> > > I'm hoping that there is still community consensus to switch to git. > > Personally speaking, a +1 to switch to git. Absolutely +1 for converting as well.
jeff
