On Thu, 2 May 2019 at 12:36, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 09:37:36AM +0200, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> > >         libphobos/
> > >         * std/math.d (IeeeFlags.getIeeeFlags): Handle RISC-V soft-float
> > >         ABI.
> > >         (IeeeFlags.resetIeeeFlags): Likewise.
> > >         (FloatingPointControl.getControlState): Likewise.
> > >         (FloatingPointControl.setControlState): Likewise.
>
> > >  I believe this change is obviously correct, and I also verified generated
> > > code using `objdump -d'.  I have no way to regression-test it right now.
> > >
> > >  Please confirm if I correctly referred to identifiers in the ChangeLog
> > > entry though, as my experience WRT the D programming language and its
> > > syntax in particular is nil.
> > >
> > >  My understanding is changes to `libphobos' are supposed to go upstream
> > > first, but r270522 is a local change anyway AFAICT, and technically a
> > > `--enable-languages=all' build regression, so we better fix it ASAP.
> > >
> > >  Finally my WDC copyright assignment with FSF is still in the works, but I
> > > believe this change can be considered legally insignificant for copyright
> > > purposes, i.e. having at most 15 lines or so, unless adding white space
> > > for indentation counts against that limit as well (which I doubt).
> > >
> > >  With all of the above in mind, OK to apply to trunk and to GCC 9?
> > >
> >
> > Looks OK to me.
>
> The change is ok for 9.1 if it can be committed to gcc-9-branch today.
>

Committed to both trunk and gcc-9-branch.


-- 
Iain

Reply via email to