Hi Mike, On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 05:16:37PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote: > This fixes some of the PowerPC tests that had implicit assumptions about the > long double format. The fixes involved: > > 1) Using long double __complex instead of using a KC attribute;
Why? Does KC not work? It should work. > 2) Explicitly adding -mabi=ibmlongdouble; (or) What in these tests requires IBM long double? It is not clear. > 3) Using __ibm128 instead of long double if long double is IEEE > 128-bit. Can't you do that *always*? Why not? Segher
