Hi Jakub,

>>Still missing . at the end of the above line.

The sentence continues on the next line (so the "." is there):

+* config/rx/constraints.md (CALL_OP_SYMBOL_REF): Added new constraint
+to allow or block "symbol_ref" depending on the value of TARGET_JSR.

 I think this is OK, please confirm.

Best Regards,
Sebastian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
> Sent: 12 February 2018 13:30
> To: Sebastian Perta <sebastian.pe...@renesas.com>
> Cc: Nick Clifton <ni...@redhat.com>; gcc-patches <gcc-
> patc...@gcc.gnu.org>
> Subject: Re: PING [PATCH] RX movsicc degrade fix
>
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 01:27:24PM -0000, Sebastian Perta wrote:
> > --- ChangeLog(revision 257583)
> > +++ ChangeLog(working copy)
> > @@ -129,8 +129,7 @@
> >
> >  2018-02-09  Sebastian Perta  <sebastian.pe...@renesas.com>
> >
> > -* config/rx.md: updated "movsicc" expand to be matched by GCC
> > -* testsuite/gcc.target/rx/movsicc.c: new test case
> > +* config/rx/rx.md (movsicc): Update expander to be matched by
> GCC.
> >
> >  2018-02-09  Peter Bergner  <berg...@vnet.ibm.com>
> >
> > @@ -143,10 +142,10 @@
> >
> >  2018-02-09  Sebastian Perta  <sebastian.pe...@renesas.com>
> >
> > -* config/rx/constraints.md: added new constraint
> CALL_OP_SYMBOL_REF
> > -to allow or block "symbol_ref" depending on value of TARGET_JSR
> > -* config/rx/rx.md: use CALL_OP_SYMBOL_REF in call_internal and
> > -call_value_internal insns
> > +* config/rx/constraints.md (CALL_OP_SYMBOL_REF): Added new
> constraint
>
> Still missing . at the end of the above line.
>
> Otherwise LGTM.
>
> Jakub



Renesas Electronics Europe Ltd, Dukes Meadow, Millboard Road, Bourne End, 
Buckinghamshire, SL8 5FH, UK. Registered in England & Wales under Registered 
No. 04586709.

Reply via email to