On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 3:09 PM, David Woodhouse <dw...@infradead.org> wrote: > > I think we should stick with what we have now, with the names of the > thunks actually being the *full* name of the register (rax, eax, etc.) > that they use.
It that works for the gcc people, then yes, I agree. The mixed
"sometimes full, sometimes not" approach just seems broken.
Linus
