On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 5:35 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 8:19 AM, Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 9:01 AM, Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 2:28 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Uros, >>>> >>>> Can you take a look at my x86 backend changes so that they are ready >>>> to check in once we have consensus. >>> >>> Please finish the talks about the correct approach first. Once the >>> consensus is reached, please post the final version of the patches for >>> review. >>> >>> BTW: I have no detailed insight in these issues, so I'll look mostly >>> at the implementation details, probably early next week. >> >> One general remark is on the usage of -1 as an invalid register > > This has been rewritten. The checked in patch no longer does that.
I'm looking directly into current indirect_thunk_name, output_indirect_thunk and output_indirect_thunk_function functions in i386.c which have plenty of the mentioned checks. Uros.
