On Sun, 2018-01-14 at 15:02 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 2:39 PM, David Woodhouse <dw...@infradead.org > > wrote: > > > > I'm not convinced we want to do this, but I'll defer to Linus. > > Well, I guess we have no choice, if gcc ends up using the stupid > names.
At this point, they'll do what we ask. See Uros's earlier message: > ... the difference is only a couple of lines in the > compiler source which we also can live with. But please discuss my > proposal also in the kernel community, and weight the benefits and > drawbacks of each approach before the final decision. > > Please pass the final decision to gcc community, and we'll implement it. I think we should stick with what we have now, with the names of the thunks actually being the *full* name of the register (rax, eax, etc.) that they use.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
