On 11/02/2016 03:55 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
Did you mean this patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-10/msg01358.html
That one is ok after the test, sorry for not being more clear. Bernd
- [PATCH 0/3] use rtx_insn * more tbsaunde+gcc
- [PATCH 2/3] split up the trial variable in reorg.c:re... tbsaunde+gcc
- [PATCH 3/3] split up some variables to use rtx_insn *... tbsaunde+gcc
- [PATCH 1/3] use rtx_insn * in various places where it... tbsaunde+gcc
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] use rtx_insn * more Jeff Law
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] use rtx_insn * more Trevor Saunders
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] use rtx_insn * more David Malcolm
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] use rtx_insn * more Bernd Schmidt
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] use rtx_insn * more Trevor Saunders
