On Wed, 2016-11-02 at 00:05 -0400, Trevor Saunders wrote: > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 07:37:54AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > > On 10/28/2016 01:13 PM, tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org wrote: > > > From: Trevor Saunders <tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org> > > > > > > HI, > > > > > > This series changes various variables type from rtx to rtx_insn * > > > so that the > > > remaining patches in this series > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-10/msg01353.html can be > > > applied. > > > > > > patches bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-linux-gnu, and run > > > through config-list.mk, ok? > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > Trev > > > > > > Trevor Saunders (3): > > > use rtx_insn * in various places where it is obvious > > > split up the trial variable in reorg.c:relax_delay_slots to use > > > rtx_insn * more > > > split up some variables to use rtx_insn * more > > All 3 patches in this series are fine. > > Thanks for the reviews. > > Can I trouble you to look at > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-10/ > now that it is tested on aarch64?
I think you're missing the full URL here; the above URL is the index for all of October. Did you mean this patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-10/msg01358.html ?
