On 12 September 2016 at 22:57, Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > I'm checking in this patch, which should fix the remaining issues: >
Hi Jason, Since this commit (r240100), I'm seeing failures on: g++.dg/cpp0x/gen-attrs-21.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors) g++.dg/cpp0x/gen-attrs-21.C -std=c++14 (test for excess errors) on arm* targets. Christophe > On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Andreas Schwab <sch...@linux-m68k.org> wrote: >> FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/aligned-new1.C (test for excess errors) >> Excess errors: >> /daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20160910/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/aligned-new1.C:10:20: >> warning: requested alignment 64 is larger than 16 [-Wattributes] >> FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/aligned-new1.C execution test >> FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/aligned-new4.C (test for warnings, line 11) >> FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/aligned-new4.C (test for excess errors) >> Excess errors: >> /daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20160910/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/aligned-new4.C:3:20: >> warning: requested alignment 64 is larger than 16 [-Wattributes] >> /daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20160910/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/aligned-new4.C:4:20: >> warning: requested alignment 64 is larger than 16 [-Wattributes] >> FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1z/aligned-new5.C -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors) >> Excess errors: >> aligned-new5.C:(.text+0xe): undefined reference to `operator new(unsigned >> int, std::align_val_t)' >> >> Andreas. >> >> -- >> Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org >> GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 >> "And now for something completely different."
