On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 05:01:34PM +0100, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Not in the limited runs that I experimented with so far, but I
> certainly kept this possibility in mind too. If so, I would either
> set it back before invoking dg-finish or dismiss the whole idea.
>
> > > However, the C++ and Fortran cases use gfortran-dg-runtest to cycle
> > > through a set of torture options and I have not yet discovered the
> > > right magic variable to set (for example, adding -Wno-hsa to
> > > DG_TORTURE_OPTIONS elements does not work).
> > >
> > > I'm afraid I have spent way too much time on this already, so unless
> > > someone has any ideas, I'd suggest that we use the (already approved)
> > > name-changing gomp patch as it is. Or at least for C++ and Fortran.
> >
> > Do you have URL for what you refer to?
> >
>
> Sure, the patch has been posted here:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg00071.html
For the g*.dg/gomp/, if you'd only move -Wno-hsa into the last argument
next to -fopenmp, how many tests would be affected? If not really many,
perhaps those could be changed to use dg-additional-options instead of
dg-options.
Jakub
