On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Bernd Schmidt <bschm...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> it's not target independent code. Are you suggesting to add a config/ >> to libobjc? IMHO for a not really mantained frontend / target lib that's >> an excessive requirement. > > > If necessary, then yes that would be a better solution. > > Even just keeping the abstraction of the macro and putting definitions of it > inside #ifdef at the top of the file would be an improvement over the > submitted patch, but IMO still not really compatible with our standards.
I agree, that would make the source of the copy more obvious. Still libobjc is beyond what I consider compatible with our standards (just look at the hoops it jumps through to make the target macros work!) Richard. > > Bernd >
