On March 14, 2015 2:02:38 PM GMT+01:00, Alan Modra <amo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>I'll also throw together a testcase or three. For execute tests I'm >thinking of using sbrk to locate an odd sized struct such that access >past the end segfaults, rather than mmap/munmap as was done in the >pr36043 testcase. Does that sound reasonable? Well since sbrk was marked LEGACY in SUSv2 and was removed in SUSv3 (and still is in 1003.1-2008) I'm not sure it is wise to use it in new code.. Using it will bite testing on legacy-free setups, fwiw. Cheers,
