On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 06:14:40AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 6:02 AM, Alan Modra <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I'll also throw together a testcase or three. For execute tests I'm
> > thinking of using sbrk to locate an odd sized struct such that access
> > past the end segfaults, rather than mmap/munmap as was done in the
> > pr36043 testcase. Does that sound reasonable?
>
> Can you add a testcase in
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36043
I was thinking that mmap/munmap is less portable than sbrk. Hmm, a
grep over the testsuite says mmap is already used and
do-do run { target mmap } is available. OK, I'm happy to jump that
way too.
--
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM
