On 01/04/15 10:16, Richard Biener wrote:
Perhaps. Neither John nor I felt it was too conservative. But disagreeing slightly on this isn't a big deal.But either your new hook or the original fix makes no sense.All I want is to restore the old behavior on x86. If the original fix makes no sense, should it be reverted?I think the original fix is too conservative
But I also think there is a target independent bug, thus a target hook to "fix" things for x86 makes no sense.
Agreed 100%. Jeff
