Steve Ellcey <s...@cup.hp.com> wrote on 15/06/2011 08:15:27 PM:
> > > testsuite/ChangeLog: > > > > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-16.c: Rename to ... > > * gcc.dg/vect/no-fast-math-vect16.c: ... this. > > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-3.c: Adjust misalignment values > > for double-word vectors. > > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-4.c: Likewise. > > * gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-10.c: Replace vect_hw_misalign with > > vect_element_align. > > * gcc.dg/vect/vect.exp: Run no-fast-math-* tests with > > -fno-fast-math. > > Ira, > > This change broke vect-peel-3.c and vect-peel-4.c on IA64 HP-UX. > I get these failures: > > FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-3.c -flto scan-tree-dump-times vect > "Alignment of access forced using peeling" 1 > FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-3.c -flto scan-tree-dump-times vect > "vectorized 1 loops" 1 > FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-3.c scan-tree-dump-times vect > "Alignment of access forced using peeling" 1 > FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-3.c scan-tree-dump-times vect > "vectorized 1 loops" 1 > FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-4.c -flto scan-tree-dump-times vect > "vectorized 1 loops" 1 > FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-4.c scan-tree-dump-times vect > "vectorized 1 loops" 1 > > I think that changing i+6 and i+2 to i+5 and i+1 broke things on HP-UX > because we are big-endian and the old values may not have worked on ARM > because it is little-endian (just guessing). > > I am not sure what we want to do to make this test work on both platforms. > Do you have any ideas? I don't think it is related to endianess. Could you please send me the dump files (created with -fdump-tree-vect-details)? Thanks, Ira > > Steve Ellcey > s...@cup.hp.com
