> testsuite/ChangeLog: > > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-16.c: Rename to ... > * gcc.dg/vect/no-fast-math-vect16.c: ... this. > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-3.c: Adjust misalignment values > for double-word vectors. > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-4.c: Likewise. > * gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-10.c: Replace vect_hw_misalign with > vect_element_align. > * gcc.dg/vect/vect.exp: Run no-fast-math-* tests with > -fno-fast-math.
Ira, This change broke vect-peel-3.c and vect-peel-4.c on IA64 HP-UX. I get these failures: FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-3.c -flto scan-tree-dump-times vect "Alignment of access forced using peeling" 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-3.c -flto scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-3.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "Alignment of access forced using peeling" 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-3.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-4.c -flto scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1 FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-4.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1 I think that changing i+6 and i+2 to i+5 and i+1 broke things on HP-UX because we are big-endian and the old values may not have worked on ARM because it is little-endian (just guessing). I am not sure what we want to do to make this test work on both platforms. Do you have any ideas? Steve Ellcey s...@cup.hp.com