> testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * gcc.dg/vect/vect-16.c: Rename to ...
> * gcc.dg/vect/no-fast-math-vect16.c: ... this.
> * gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-3.c: Adjust misalignment values
> for double-word vectors.
> * gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-4.c: Likewise.
> * gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-10.c: Replace vect_hw_misalign with
> vect_element_align.
> * gcc.dg/vect/vect.exp: Run no-fast-math-* tests with
> -fno-fast-math.
Ira,
This change broke vect-peel-3.c and vect-peel-4.c on IA64 HP-UX.
I get these failures:
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-3.c -flto scan-tree-dump-times vect
"Alignment of access forced using peeling" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-3.c -flto scan-tree-dump-times vect
"vectorized 1 loops" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-3.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "Alignment of
access forced using peeling" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-3.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1
loops" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-4.c -flto scan-tree-dump-times vect
"vectorized 1 loops" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-4.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1
loops" 1
I think that changing i+6 and i+2 to i+5 and i+1 broke things on HP-UX
because we are big-endian and the old values may not have worked on ARM
because it is little-endian (just guessing).
I am not sure what we want to do to make this test work on both platforms.
Do you have any ideas?
Steve Ellcey
[email protected]
