> testsuite/ChangeLog:
> 
>        * gcc.dg/vect/vect-16.c: Rename to ...
>        * gcc.dg/vect/no-fast-math-vect16.c: ... this.
>        * gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-3.c: Adjust misalignment values
>        for double-word vectors.
>        * gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-4.c: Likewise.
>        * gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-10.c: Replace vect_hw_misalign with
>        vect_element_align.
>        * gcc.dg/vect/vect.exp: Run no-fast-math-* tests with
>        -fno-fast-math.

Ira,

This change broke vect-peel-3.c and vect-peel-4.c on IA64 HP-UX.
I get these failures:

        FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-3.c -flto scan-tree-dump-times vect 
"Alignment of access forced using peeling" 1
        FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-3.c -flto scan-tree-dump-times vect 
"vectorized 1 loops" 1
        FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-3.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "Alignment of 
access forced using peeling" 1
        FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-3.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 
loops" 1
        FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-4.c -flto scan-tree-dump-times vect 
"vectorized 1 loops" 1
        FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-4.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 
loops" 1

I think that changing i+6 and i+2 to i+5 and i+1 broke things on HP-UX
because we are big-endian and the old values may not have worked on ARM
because it is little-endian (just guessing).

I am not sure what we want to do to make this test work on both platforms.
Do you have any ideas?

Steve Ellcey
s...@cup.hp.com

Reply via email to