Actually, is there any case where lbasename wouldn't work instead of filename_dirrchr?
(gdb is already making use of unix_lbasename / dos_lbasename at places where it needs to handle host vs target paths). -- Pedro Alves
Actually, is there any case where lbasename wouldn't work instead of filename_dirrchr?
(gdb is already making use of unix_lbasename / dos_lbasename at places where it needs to handle host vs target paths). -- Pedro Alves