> Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 19:51:14 +0100 > From: Kai Tietz <ktiet...@googlemail.com> > Cc: Pedro Alves <pe...@codesourcery.com>, gdb-patc...@sourceware.org, > gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, binut...@sourceware.org > > > In my experience, the strchr analog is not needed, only the strrchr > > one (which could be used quite a lot). The few places that use strchr > > now should actually be rewritten to search from the end, because > > that's what they need. > > > > Here I am not that sure. For example in gcc's gengtype.c > (read_input_list) is a use-case for strchr on filenames, which can't > be expressed by strrchr.
I don't see any reason to have in libiberty a function that has a single use.
