------- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-10 19:40 ------- If addvsi3 actually performs addvdi3, that will be most surprising to everyone. I think that's a very bad idea. Since we are not invoking addvsi3, and I suspect it's impossible to convince the compiler to do so, I think there's no reason to provide the backward compatibility function at all; the symbol was unused and unusable.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18665
