------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-10 19:24 ------- > I'm not sure redirecting __addvsi3 to __addvdi3 is correct. If we provide > that > symbol at all, I think it should do what it advertises.
But what we export now as __addvsi3 will be exported as __addvdi3 after the fix. > Just so I'm clear, are we invoking __addvsi3 right now, or is it just that > __addvdi3 has the wrong implementation? The latter. __addvdi3 uses double words everywhere, so is actually __addvti3 on 64-bit targets. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18665
