------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-11 09:39 ------- > Since the symbol exists in 3.3 (which I'd forgotten), we have to keep it. > But I don't see any reason we can't fix the bug in its implementation. > So let's do proper simode arithmetic.
Agreed. It turns out that the same problem exists for DImode arithmetic on targets for which the word_mode is smaller than SImode: since the di variants were always emitted, should we still emit them now? Can the big __mulvdi3 routine contained in libgcc2.c be compiled with real DImode on those targets? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18665
