https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118935
--- Comment #26 from huangpei at loongson dot cn <huangpei at loongson dot cn> --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #21) > (In reply to [email protected] from comment #20) > > only loongarch64-unknown-linux-gnu > > > > > which arch did I need to test? > > > > I can get access to x64@linux and arm64@linux > > I understand that, right now, there is no independent test case which fails > without the patch and succeeds with it. Normally, this is a requirement > for gcc patches, but if it requires non-standard libgfortran build > options, I am not sure how to do it, at least as part of the regular > testsuite. > > Building this on as many systems as possible with different locking > behavior and -O0 would be a good step. I could try that on POWER, > for example. I test arm64@linux on r17-3249-gc5d147d7370fb3, =========================================================================== === gfortran Summary === # of expected passes 75854 # of unexpected failures 8 # of expected failures 339 # of unsupported tests 181 === libgomp Summary === # of expected passes 17826 # of unexpected failures 3 # of expected failures 284 # of unsupported tests 898 =========================================================================== no regression
