https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121199

--- Comment #3 from John Dong <dongjianqiang2 at huawei dot com> ---
(In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #2)
> It looks a bit like this was fixed in gcc-9.  
> 
> Based on
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88714#c19
> I suspect this is just a dup of that.

Thanks. Really appreciate you sharing the link.

Reply via email to