https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121199
--- Comment #3 from John Dong <dongjianqiang2 at huawei dot com> --- (In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #2) > It looks a bit like this was fixed in gcc-9. > > Based on > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88714#c19 > I suspect this is just a dup of that. Thanks. Really appreciate you sharing the link.
