gcc-bugs  

Messages by Thread

• [Bug fortran/85352] [13/14/15 Regression] Incorrect error diagnosed for dummy argument used in specification expression to subprogram with ENTRY cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/85352] [13/14/15 Regression] Incorrect error diagnosed for dummy argument used in specification expression to subprogram with ENTRY cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/85352] [13/14/15 Regression] Incorrect error diagnosed for dummy argument used in specification expression to subprogram with ENTRY pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug target/125279] New: Wrong lowering of `vmaxh_f16` and `vminh_f16` sayantn05 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/125279] Wrong lowering of `vmaxh_f16` and `vminh_f16` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug middle-end/123286] SAT_ADD is not constant folded at the gimple level cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/123286] SAT_ADD is not constant folded at the gimple level pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/123286] SAT_ADD is not constant folded at the gimple level cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug target/125278] New: vcvth_n_f16_u32 sayantn05 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/125278] vcvth_n_f16_u32 sayantn05 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug target/124948] wrong code with wrapping __atomic_add_fetch() on _BitInt(17) on riscv law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug target/124798] no_caller_saved_registers attribute vs. spills in the caller hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/124798] no_caller_saved_registers attribute vs. spills in the caller hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug tree-optimization/115571] `cmp * float` vs `tmp_bool * float` and better vectorization for `cmp * float` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/115571] `cmp * float` vs `tmp_bool * float` and better vectorization for `cmp * float` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug libstdc++/125277] New: stable_sort should use insertion sort for sufficiently small ranges rs2740 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/125277] stable_sort should use insertion sort for sufficiently small ranges redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c++/123638] [ICE] segfault defaulted operator<=> for an enum pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c++/122562] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault cp_type_quals with std=c++20 since 10.2 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c++/105202] ICE: defaulted comparison operators for enumerated types segfault pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c++/125276] New: Defaulting equality operator (==) causes segfault matthewlbritt at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/125276] Defaulting equality operator (==) causes segfault pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/125276] Defaulting equality operator (==) causes segfault redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/125276] Defaulting equality operator (==) causes segfault matthewlbritt at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug target/120077] Switch lm32 to LRA cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/120077] Switch lm32 to LRA law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug target/106356] static-pie for arm not implemented sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug other/125275] New: check_GNU_style.py checks .opt for a few things which should not pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug other/125275] check_GNU_style.py checks .opt for a few things which should not pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug other/125275] check_GNU_style.py checks .opt for a few things which should not cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug other/125275] check_GNU_style.py checks .opt for a few things which should not pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug middle-end/125274] New: BOOL_BITFIELD in system.h can be removed pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125274] BOOL_BITFIELD in system.h can be removed pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c++/115314] auto template parameter has const qualifier on it even though the original does not ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug middle-end/93644] [13/14/15/16/17 Regression] spurious -Wreturn-local-addr with PHI of PHI eggert at cs dot ucla.edu via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/93644] [13/14/15/16/17 Regression] spurious -Wreturn-local-addr with PHI of PHI sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug target/125148] [16/17 Regression] Highway SVE256 test fails since g:210d06502f22964c7214586c54f8eb54a6965bfd tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/125148] [16/17 Regression] Highway SVE256 test fails since g:210d06502f22964c7214586c54f8eb54a6965bfd tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/125148] [16/17 Regression] Highway SVE256 test fails since g:210d06502f22964c7214586c54f8eb54a6965bfd cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug middle-end/125273] New: ICE: verify_gimple failed: non-top-level 'bit_field_ref' at -O1 and above zsojka at seznam dot cz via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125273] ICE: verify_gimple failed: non-top-level 'bit_field_ref' at -O1 and above pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c++/24847] Instantiates un-called copy constructor pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c++/101113] g++ thinks constructor suppressed by a requires clause is actually a bad copy constructor pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c++/125272] New: GCC rejects valid program with associated constraints on ctor jlame646 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/125272] GCC rejects valid program with associated constraints on ctor pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/125272] GCC rejects valid program with associated constraints on ctor pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/125272] GCC rejects valid program with associated constraints on ctor jlame646 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug cobol/125271] New: Paragraph name resolution not local to SECTION when duplicate paragraph names exist across sections peeterjoot at protonmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug target/125270] New: z13: Inefficient emulation for vec_abs on vector signed __int128 jens.seifert at de dot ibm.com via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug analyzer/125269] New: feature request: Support for clang style ownership_returns/takes andres at anarazel dot de via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug analyzer/125269] feature request: Support for clang style ownership_returns/takes matthew at wil dot cx via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c++/125268] New: ICE: using return type of lambda with deduced NTTP pack as a templated type alias email at miropalmu dot cc via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/125268] ICE: using return type of lambda with deduced NTTP pack as a templated type alias email at miropalmu dot cc via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/125268] ICE: using return type of lambda with deduced NTTP pack as a templated type alias mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug tree-optimization/125050] `a == INT_MIN ? INT_MIN : -a` is not converted into `(signed)-(unsigned)a` avinal.xlvii at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/125050] `a == INT_MIN ? INT_MIN : -a` is not converted into `(signed)-(unsigned)a` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/125050] `a == INT_MIN ? INT_MIN : -a` is not converted into `(signed)-(unsigned)a` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/125050] `a == INT_MIN ? INT_MIN : -a` is not converted into `(signed)-(unsigned)a` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug fortran/125267] New: [16.1 regression] segmentation fault in compiled binary juergen.reuter at desy dot de via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/125267] [16.1 regression] segmentation fault in compiled binary juergen.reuter at desy dot de via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/125267] [16/17 Regression] segmentation fault in compiled binary rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/125267] [16.1 regression] segmentation fault in compiled binary juergen.reuter at desy dot de via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/125267] [16.1 regression] segmentation fault when using -fcheck flags juergen.reuter at desy dot de via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/125267] [16.1 regression] segmentation fault when using -fcheck flags juergen.reuter at desy dot de via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/125267] [16.1 regression] segmentation fault when using -fcheck flags juergen.reuter at desy dot de via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/125267] [16.1 regression] segmentation fault when using -fcheck flags juergen.reuter at desy dot de via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/125267] [16.1 regression] segmentation fault when using -fcheck flags kargl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/125267] [16/17 regression] segmentation fault when using -fcheck flags juergen.reuter at desy dot de via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/125267] [16/17 regression] segmentation fault when using -fcheck flags juergen.reuter at desy dot de via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/125267] [16/17 regression] segmentation fault when using -fcheck flags kargl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/125267] [16/17 regression] segmentation fault when using -fcheck flags juergen.reuter at desy dot de via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/125267] [16/17 regression] segmentation fault when using -fcheck flags anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/125267] [16/17 regression] segmentation fault when using -fcheck flags mikael at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug middle-end/125266] New: default_function_abi may not be the default function ABI hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125266] default_function_abi may not be the default function ABI hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125266] default_function_abi may not be the default function ABI hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125266] default_function_abi may not be the default function ABI hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125266] default_function_abi may not be the default function ABI rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125266] default_function_abi may not be the default function ABI rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125266] default_function_abi may not be the default function ABI hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125266] default_function_abi may not be the default function ABI hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125266] default_function_abi may not be the default function ABI rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125266] default_function_abi may not be the default function ABI hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125266] default_function_abi may not be the default function ABI rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125266] default_function_abi may not be the default function ABI hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125266] default_function_abi may not be the default function ABI rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125266] default_function_abi may not be the default function ABI hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125266] default_function_abi may not be the default function ABI rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125266] default_function_abi may not be the default function ABI hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125266] default_function_abi may not be the default function ABI rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125266] default_function_abi may not be the default function ABI hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125266] default_function_abi may not be the default function ABI rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug tree-optimization/124909] gcc.dg/match-shift-cmp-3 fails with -fshort-enums azoff at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug analyzer/125265] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/mkostemp-1.c test for warnings azoff at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug analyzer/125265] FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/mkostemp-1.c test for warnings azoff at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug testsuite/124621] FAIL: g++.dg/reflect/reflect_constant_(array|string)2.C azoff at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug testsuite/124621] FAIL: g++.dg/reflect/reflect_constant_(array|string)2.C cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug testsuite/124621] FAIL: g++.dg/reflect/reflect_constant_(array|string)2.C jason at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug testsuite/124621] FAIL: g++.dg/reflect/reflect_constant_(array|string)2.C azoff at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug target/125264] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/bitint-95.c -O0 (test for excess errors) azoff at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug fortran/125263] New: Error with intrinsic assignment involving allocatable array of user-defined type that has an allocatable array component b.j.braams at cwi dot nl via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/125263] [14/15/16/17 Regression] Error with intrinsic assignment involving allocatable array of user-defined type that has an allocatable array component anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/125263] [14/15/16/17 Regression] Error with intrinsic assignment involving allocatable array of user-defined type that has an allocatable array component pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/125263] [14/15/16/17 Regression] Error with intrinsic assignment involving allocatable array of user-defined type that has an allocatable array component cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c++/125262] New: constexpr asm doesn't work with std::string ivan.lazaric.gcc at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/125262] constexpr asm doesn't work with std::string pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/125262] constexpr asm doesn't work with std::string pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug rtl-optimization/121426] [hard-reg constraints] ICE: Spill fail from LRA for insn with hard-reg constraints cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug rtl-optimization/121426] [hard-reg constraints] ICE: Spill fail from LRA for insn with hard-reg constraints gjl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug target/113856] `(vect64 float){1.0f, 0}` code generation could just be `fmov sN, 1.0f` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/113856] `(vect64 float){1.0f, 0}` code generation could just be `fmov sN, 1.0f` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug middle-end/19466] [meta-bug] bit-fields are non optimal law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug rtl-optimization/80770] suboptimal code negating a 1-bit _Bool field cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug rtl-optimization/80770] suboptimal code negating a 1-bit _Bool field law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c/125261] New: _Generic -Wuseless-cast false positive eggert at cs dot ucla.edu via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125261] _Generic -Wuseless-cast false positive pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125261] _Generic -Wuseless-cast false positive pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125261] _Generic -Wuseless-cast false positive eggert at cs dot ucla.edu via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125261] _Generic -Wuseless-cast false positive uecker at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125261] _Generic -Wuseless-cast false positive jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125261] _Generic -Wuseless-cast false positive uecker at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125261] _Generic -Wuseless-cast false positive uecker at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125261] _Generic -Wuseless-cast false positive uecker at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125261] _Generic -Wuseless-cast false positive uecker at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125261] _Generic -Wuseless-cast false positive cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125261] _Generic -Wuseless-cast false positive uecker at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug tree-optimization/125260] New: New signed overflow introduced by vectorization kristerw at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/125260] New signed overflow introduced by vectorization rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug target/45835] Consider push simm8;pop reg for -Os roger at nextmovesoftware dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/45835] Consider push simm8;pop reg for -Os egallager at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug other/92396] -ftime-trace support egallager at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug middle-end/125259] New: [16/17 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: integral result type precision does not match field size of 'bit_field_ref' zsojka at seznam dot cz via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125259] [16/17 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: integral result type precision does not match field size of 'bit_field_ref' pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125259] [16/17 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: integral result type precision does not match field size of 'bit_field_ref' pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125259] [16/17 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: integral result type precision does not match field size of 'bit_field_ref' pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125259] [16/17 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: integral result type precision does not match field size of 'bit_field_ref' since r16-4682 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125259] [16/17 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: integral result type precision does not match field size of 'bit_field_ref' since r16-4682 artemiyv at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125259] [16/17 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: integral result type precision does not match field size of 'bit_field_ref' since r16-4682 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125259] [16/17 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: integral result type precision does not match field size of 'bit_field_ref' since r16-4682 artemiyv at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125259] [16/17 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: integral result type precision does not match field size of 'bit_field_ref' since r16-4682 cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125259] [16/17 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: integral result type precision does not match field size of 'bit_field_ref' since r16-4682 cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125259] [16/17 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: integral result type precision does not match field size of 'bit_field_ref' since r16-4682 artemiyv at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug sanitizer/120201] [13/14/15/16/17 Regression] generates a misaligned vector operation for std::memcpy with -march=znver4 since santizer doesn't allocate properly aligned stack by r6-6813-g63998a6336239d sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug sanitizer/120201] [13/14/15/16/17 Regression] generates a misaligned vector operation for std::memcpy with -march=znver4 since santizer doesn't allocate properly aligned stack by r6-6813-g63998a6336239d pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug sanitizer/120201] [13/14/15/16/17 Regression] generates a misaligned vector operation for std::memcpy with -march=znver4 since santizer doesn't allocate properly aligned stack by r6-6813-g63998a6336239d hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug sanitizer/120201] [13/14/15/16/17 Regression] generates a misaligned vector operation for std::memcpy with -march=znver4 since santizer doesn't allocate properly aligned stack by r6-6813-g63998a6336239d hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug sanitizer/120201] [13/14/15/16/17 Regression] generates a misaligned vector operation for std::memcpy with -march=znver4 since santizer doesn't allocate properly aligned stack by r6-6813-g63998a6336239d stuart.a.hayhurst at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug lto/125258] New: ICE: zsojka at seznam dot cz via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug lto/125258] ICE: resolution sub id 0xe3d338721a4464e not in object file with -flto -flto-partition=none -fltrans pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug driver/125258] ICE: resolution sub id 0xe3d338721a4464e not in object file with -flto -flto-partition=none -fltrans rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug lto/125257] New: ICE: in partitioner_base, at lto/lto-partition.cc:993 with -flto -flto-partition=cache --param=lto-min-partition=0 on any input zsojka at seznam dot cz via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug lto/125257] ICE: in partitioner_base, at lto/lto-partition.cc:993 with -flto -flto-partition=cache --param=lto-min-partition=0 on any input pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug lto/125257] ICE: in partitioner_base, at lto/lto-partition.cc:993 with -flto -flto-partition=cache --param=lto-min-partition=0 on any input rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug lto/125257] ICE: in partitioner_base, at lto/lto-partition.cc:993 with -flto -flto-partition=cache --param=lto-min-partition=0 on any input mjires at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug lto/125257] ICE: in partitioner_base, at lto/lto-partition.cc:993 with -flto -flto-partition=cache --param=lto-min-partition=0 on any input mjires at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug analyzer/125256] New: feature request: Allow malloc-like functions to opt out of leak warnings andres at anarazel dot de via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug algol68/125255] New: Inaccurate printing of floating point values even when numbers are exactly representable jpl.algol68 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug algol68/125255] Inaccurate printing of floating point values even when numbers are exactly representable jemarch at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug algol68/125254] New: Improper IEEE754 arithmetic results with Inf and NaN jpl.algol68 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c++/125253] New: [16/17 Regression] Highway EMU128 tests fail on GCC 16.1.0 herrtimson at yahoo dot de via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/125253] [16/17 Regression] Highway EMU128 tests fail on GCC 16.1.0 herrtimson at yahoo dot de via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125253] [16/17 Regression] Highway EMU128 tests fail on GCC 16.1.0 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125253] [16/17 Regression] Highway EMU128 tests fail on GCC 16.1.0 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125253] [16/17 Regression] Highway EMU128 tests fail on GCC 16.1.0 sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125253] [16/17 Regression] Highway EMU128 tests fail on GCC 16.1.0 herrtimson at yahoo dot de via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125253] [16/17 Regression] Highway EMU128 tests fail on GCC 16.1.0 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125253] [16/17 Regression] Highway EMU128 tests fail on GCC 16.1.0 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125253] [16/17 Regression] Highway EMU128 tests fail on GCC 16.1.0 herrtimson at yahoo dot de via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125253] [16/17 Regression] Highway EMU128 tests fail on GCC 16.1.0 sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug fortran/100906] Bind(c): failure handling character with len/=1 tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/100906] Bind(c): failure handling character with len/=1 tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c/125252] New: [15/16/17 regression] TBAA vs struct type in C23 sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125252] [15/16/17 regression] TBAA vs struct type in C23 (notmuch miscompiled) sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125252] [15/16/17 regression] TBAA vs struct type in C23 (notmuch miscompiled) sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125252] [15/16/17 regression] TBAA vs struct type in C23 (notmuch miscompiled) sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125252] [15/16/17 regression] TBAA vs struct type in C23 (notmuch miscompiled) uecker at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125252] [15/16/17 regression] TBAA vs struct type in C23 (notmuch miscompiled) sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125252] [15/16/17 regression] TBAA vs struct type in C23 (notmuch miscompiled) uecker at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125252] [15/16/17 regression] TBAA vs struct type in C23 (notmuch miscompiled) uecker at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125252] [15/16/17 regression] TBAA vs struct type in C23 (notmuch miscompiled) amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125252] [15/16/17 regression] TBAA vs struct type in C23 (notmuch miscompiled) uecker at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125252] [15/16/17 regression] TBAA vs struct type in C23 (notmuch miscompiled) uecker at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125252] [15/16/17 regression] TBAA vs struct type in C23 (notmuch miscompiled) uecker at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125252] [15/16/17 regression] TBAA vs struct type in C23 (notmuch miscompiled) sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125252] [15/16/17 regression] TBAA vs struct type in C23 (notmuch miscompiled) uecker at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125252] [15/16/17 regression] TBAA vs struct type in C23 (notmuch miscompiled) uecker at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125252] [15/16/17 regression] TBAA vs struct type in C23 (notmuch miscompiled) uecker at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125252] [15/16/17 regression] TBAA vs struct type in C23 (notmuch miscompiled) rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125252] [15/16/17 regression] TBAA vs struct type in C23 (notmuch miscompiled) uecker at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug fortran/125251] New: Check reserved identifiers with external linkage for C tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug tree-optimization/112095] `((~x) & y) ^ (x | y)` is x shivam98.tkg at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/112095] `((~x) & y) ^ (x | y)` is x cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/112095] `((~x) & y) ^ (x | y)` is x pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/112095] `((~x) & y) ^ (x | y)` is x shivam98.tkg at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/112095] `((~x) & y) ^ (x | y)` is x rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/112095] `((~x) & y) ^ (x | y)` is x rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/112095] `((~x) & y) ^ (x | y)` is x pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/112095] `((~x) & y) ^ (x | y)` is x pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug tree-optimization/125250] New: [16/17 Regression] wrong code at -O1/2/3 xxs_chy at outlook dot com via Gcc-bugs

• Earlier messages
• Later messages