https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017
--- Comment #55 from cqwrteur <unlvsur at live dot com> --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #54) > (In reply to Andrew Aladjev from comment #38) > > Sure, patches works perfect. But we need somehow decrease the chance of > > similar regressions in future. It is possible by adding any basic "canadian" > > build into the list of tests to be done before release. We should not try to > > add such test into codebase itself, we need just to intrigue any of core gcc > > developers to add this test into the virtual checklist. > > There is no "virtual checklist". If you care about a particular > configuration then YOU should be submitting results to the gcc-testresults > mailing list to report on the status of that config. > > The GCC devs are testing the configs and the targets that THEY care about. so you mean GCC devs do not care about Canadian compilation?
