https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017
--- Comment #54 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Andrew Aladjev from comment #38) > Sure, patches works perfect. But we need somehow decrease the chance of > similar regressions in future. It is possible by adding any basic "canadian" > build into the list of tests to be done before release. We should not try to > add such test into codebase itself, we need just to intrigue any of core gcc > developers to add this test into the virtual checklist. There is no "virtual checklist". If you care about a particular configuration then YOU should be submitting results to the gcc-testresults mailing list to report on the status of that config. The GCC devs are testing the configs and the targets that THEY care about.
