https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78307
--- Comment #6 from Maxim Ostapenko <m.ostapenko at samsung dot com> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > (In reply to Maxim Ostapenko from comment #4) > > But LLVM doesn't support shared UBSan runtime (the only one supported is > > ASan) and AFAIK there aren't any plans to support it there. > > Yeah, it is a very weird policy. > > > > In any case, we shouldn't be making ABI incompatible changes in the > > > libraries. So, either we should bump soname, or preferably, if it is not > > > that hard to readd those symbols, just do that, so that people don't have > > > to > > > fight yet another changed library. > > > > Do you mean we can apply a local patch? > > We can, sure. Ok, I think I can just add (perhaps empty?) stubs into libubsan to readd those symbols, this should be quite trivial.
