https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78307
--- Comment #4 from Maxim Ostapenko <m.ostapenko at samsung dot com> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > Sure, it doesn't affect gcc emitted code unless somebody calls those > directly, but perhaps say llvm compiled code using the shared libubsan.so. But LLVM doesn't support shared UBSan runtime (the only one supported is ASan) and AFAIK there aren't any plans to support it there. > In any case, we shouldn't be making ABI incompatible changes in the > libraries. So, either we should bump soname, or preferably, if it is not > that hard to readd those symbols, just do that, so that people don't have to > fight yet another changed library. Do you mean we can apply a local patch?
